Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHCX vs SHSAX
FSHCX vs SHSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSHCX vs SHSAX
FSHCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.16B vs. FSHCX (852M). FSHCX pays higher dividends than SHSAX: FSHCX (0.68) vs SHSAX (0.26). FSHCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FSHCX (40 years) vs SHSAX (27 years). SHSAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FSHCX (0.67). FSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. SHSAX (43.00). FSHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FSHCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). FSHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.50 vs. SHSAX (3.94). FSHCX return over 5 years is better than : -10.44 vs. SHSAX (-18.03).
| FSHCX | SHSAX | FSHCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.188 | -2.796 | -400% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 852M | 6.16B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.26 | 262% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.50 | 3.94 | 343% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.01 | -2.39 | 294% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.44 | -18.03 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.18 | 34.58 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers