FSHP moved above its 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 1 of 3 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 33%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 16, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on FSHP as a result. In 7 of 37 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 19%.
Following a +0.44% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FSHP advanced for three days, in 2 of 29 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 7%.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 5 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. FSHP’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 78 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.945) is normal, around the industry mean (-540.298). P/E Ratio (65.520) is within average values for comparable stocks, (115.825). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (15.932). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.020) among similar stocks. FSHP's P/S Ratio (0.000) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (3.158).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FSHP’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 99, placing this stock worse than average.
| FSHP | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 19% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 7% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FSHP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while NMP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FSHP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
FSHP (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.27% price change this week, while NMP (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.46%.
Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TSII | 13.11 | 0.50 | +3.97% |
| REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) | |||
| RSSX | 26.71 | 0.05 | +0.18% |
| Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX) | |||
| HAWX | 44.72 | 0.06 | +0.14% |
| iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) | |||
| SEIV | 49.60 | -0.03 | -0.06% |
| SEI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) | |||
| TSMZ | 7.76 | -0.14 | -1.74% |
| Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X ETF (TSMZ) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSHP has been loosely correlated with MKLYU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSHP jumps, then MKLYU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSHP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSHP | 100% | -0.62% | ||
| MKLYU - FSHP | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NOEMU - FSHP | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NOEM - FSHP | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
| LWACU - FSHP | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QETA - FSHP | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that NMP and HVMC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMP and HVMC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NMP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMP | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| HVMC - NMP | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LEGO - NMP | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FSHP - NMP | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
| SOCA - NMP | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
| AACIU - NMP | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||