Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIDX vs TMAAX
FSIDX vs TMAAX Comparison
Open Charts FSIDX vs TMAAX
FSIDX vs TMAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIDX vs. TMAAX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIDX is a Hold and TMAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSIDX (5.76B) and TMAAX (5.76B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FSIDX pays higher dividends than TMAAX: FSIDX (2.16) vs TMAAX (1.10). FSIDX was incepted earlier than TMAAX: FSIDX (23 years) vs TMAAX (21 years). TMAAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSIDX (0.67). TMAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSIDX (41.00). FSIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAAX: FSIDX (0) vs TMAAX (2000). FSIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.27 vs. TMAAX (6.66). FSIDX return over 5 years is better than : 21.77 vs. TMAAX (17.01).
| FSIDX | TMAAX | FSIDX / TMAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.13 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.36 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.828 | 9.464 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.76B | 5.76B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 1.10 | 195% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.27 | 6.66 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.88 | 35.30 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.77 | 17.01 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.29 | 69.99 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement