Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIDX vs TMAAX
FSIDX vs TMAAX Comparison
Open Charts FSIDX vs TMAAX
FSIDX vs TMAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIDX vs. TMAAX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIDX is a Hold and TMAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMAAX (5.81B) and FSIDX (5.76B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FSIDX pays higher dividends than TMAAX: FSIDX (2.30) vs TMAAX (1.12). FSIDX was incepted earlier than TMAAX: FSIDX (23 years) vs TMAAX (21 years). TMAAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSIDX (0.67). TMAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSIDX (41.00). FSIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAAX: FSIDX (0) vs TMAAX (2000). FSIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.35 vs. TMAAX (14.97). FSIDX return over 5 years is better than : 26.59 vs. TMAAX (21.59).
| FSIDX | TMAAX | FSIDX / TMAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.13 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.36 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.783 | 8.862 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.76B | 5.81B | 99% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.30 | 1.12 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.35 | 14.97 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.58 | 30.61 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.59 | 21.59 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.94 | 74.51 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement