Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIRX vs HBLAX
FSIRX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSIRX vs HBLAX
FSIRX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIRX vs. HBLAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIRX is a Hold and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FSIRX (592M). FSIRX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: FSIRX (4.20) vs HBLAX (3.19). FSIRX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FSIRX (21 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FSIRX (0.78). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSIRX (29.00). FSIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FSIRX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSIRX: HBLAX (2000) vs FSIRX (500). FSIRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.42 vs. HBLAX (5.93). FSIRX return over 5 years is better than : 33.42 vs. HBLAX (6.67).
| FSIRX | HBLAX | FSIRX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.89 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.89 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.582 | 3.670 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 592M | 11.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.20 | 3.19 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.42 | 5.93 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.53 | 20.36 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.42 | 6.67 | 501% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.22 | 42.52 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement