Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIRX vs HBLAX
FSIRX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSIRX vs HBLAX
FSIRX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIRX vs. HBLAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIRX is a Hold and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FSIRX (542M). FSIRX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: FSIRX (4.39) vs HBLAX (3.13). FSIRX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FSIRX (21 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FSIRX (0.78). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSIRX (29.00). FSIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FSIRX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSIRX: HBLAX (2000) vs FSIRX (500). FSIRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.03 vs. HBLAX (1.22). FSIRX return over 5 years is better than : 35.41 vs. HBLAX (4.63).
| FSIRX | HBLAX | FSIRX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.89 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.89 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.933 | 4.076 | 268% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 542M | 10.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.39 | 3.13 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.03 | 1.22 | 1,151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.93 | 19.75 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.41 | 4.63 | 766% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.48 | 39.00 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement