Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIRX vs HBLSX
FSIRX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts FSIRX vs HBLSX
FSIRX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIRX vs. HBLSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIRX is a Hold and HBLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FSIRX (592M). FSIRX pays higher dividends than HBLSX: FSIRX (4.20) vs HBLSX (3.08). FSIRX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: FSIRX (21 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). HBLSX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FSIRX (0.78). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSIRX (29.00). FSIRX (0) and HBLSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSIRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.42 vs. HBLSX (5.86). FSIRX return over 5 years is better than : 33.42 vs. HBLSX (6.36).
| FSIRX | HBLSX | FSIRX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.96 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.96 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.582 | 3.608 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 592M | 11.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.20 | 3.08 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.42 | 5.86 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.53 | 20.07 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.42 | 6.36 | 526% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.22 | 41.96 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement