Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIUX vs RMEBX
FSIUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSIUX vs RMEBX
FSIUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIUX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. FSIUX (3.77B). FSIUX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSIUX (1.44) vs RMEBX (1.04). FSIUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSIUX (21 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSIUX (0.67). FSIUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSIUX: RMEBX (250) vs FSIUX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.11 vs. FSIUX (6.34). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. FSIUX (20.53).
| FSIUX | RMEBX | FSIUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.483 | 6.308 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.77B | 117B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.04 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.34 | 9.11 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.07 | 34.37 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.53 | 34.74 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.23 | 94.33 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement