Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIUX vs RMEBX
FSIUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSIUX vs RMEBX
FSIUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIUX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. FSIUX (3.69B). FSIUX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSIUX (1.44) vs RMEBX (1.04). FSIUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSIUX (21 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSIUX (0.67). FSIUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSIUX: RMEBX (250) vs FSIUX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.98 vs. FSIUX (4.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. FSIUX (13.31).
| FSIUX | RMEBX | FSIUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.957 | 5.801 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 115B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.04 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.65 | 9.98 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.70 | 34.14 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.31 | 32.93 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.52 | 89.84 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement