Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIUX vs RMFCX
FSIUX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSIUX vs RMFCX
FSIUX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIUX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIUX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FSIUX (3.9B). FSIUX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FSIUX (1.38) vs RMFCX (1.15). FSIUX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSIUX (21 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSIUX (0.67). FSIUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSIUX: RMFCX (250) vs FSIUX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.11 vs. FSIUX (6.05). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.12 vs. FSIUX (23.30).
| FSIUX | RMFCX | FSIUX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.199 | 11.975 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.9B | 118B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.15 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.05 | 10.11 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.38 | 37.68 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.30 | 38.12 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.20 | 94.39 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement