Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIUX vs RMFCX
FSIUX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSIUX vs RMFCX
FSIUX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIUX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIUX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. FSIUX (3.69B). FSIUX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FSIUX (1.44) vs RMFCX (1.19). FSIUX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSIUX (21 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSIUX (0.67). FSIUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSIUX: RMFCX (250) vs FSIUX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.31 vs. FSIUX (4.65). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.04 vs. FSIUX (13.31).
| FSIUX | RMFCX | FSIUX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.957 | 6.510 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 115B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.19 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.65 | 10.31 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.70 | 35.49 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.31 | 34.04 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.52 | 92.67 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement