Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSJHX vs RGAFX
FSJHX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FSJHX vs RGAFX
FSJHX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSJHX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSJHX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FSJHX (11B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FSJHX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FSJHX (0.00). FSJHX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FSJHX (14 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FSJHX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSJHX (13.00). FSJHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FSJHX (0) vs RGAFX (250). FSJHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.90 vs. RGAFX (4.67). FSJHX return over 5 years is better than : 59.40 vs. RGAFX (17.46).
| FSJHX | RGAFX | FSJHX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.34 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.34 | 306% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.549 | 7.299 | 227% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 357B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.90 | 4.67 | 533% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.32 | 40.73 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.40 | 17.46 | 340% |
| Returns for 10 years | 199.23 | 105.95 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement