Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSJHX vs RGAGX
FSJHX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FSJHX vs RGAGX
FSJHX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSJHX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSJHX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FSJHX (11.3B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FSJHX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FSJHX (0.00). FSJHX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FSJHX (14 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FSJHX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSJHX (13.00). FSJHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FSJHX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FSJHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.08 vs. RGAGX (0.49). FSJHX return over 5 years is better than : 55.97 vs. RGAGX (15.00).
| FSJHX | RGAGX | FSJHX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.29 | 359% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.29 | 359% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.717 | 9.321 | 179% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 353B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.08 | 0.49 | 3,696% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.25 | 44.65 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.97 | 15.00 | 373% |
| Returns for 10 years | 199.23 | 110.30 | 181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers