FSK
Price
$14.84
Change
+$0.08 (+0.54%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.16B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
HRZN
Price
$5.85
Change
+$0.13 (+2.27%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
248.89M
11 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSK vs HRZN

Header iconFSK vs HRZN Comparison
Open Charts FSK vs HRZNBanner chart's image
FS KKR Capital
Price$14.84
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
Volume$2.63M
Capitalization4.16B
Horizon Technology Finance
Price$5.85
Change+$0.13 (+2.27%)
Volume$637.33K
Capitalization248.89M
FSK vs HRZN Comparison Chart in %
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRZN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSK vs. HRZN commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSK is a Hold and HRZN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FSK: $14.84 vs. HRZN: $5.85)
Brand notoriety: FSK and HRZN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSK: 95% vs. HRZN: 95%
Market capitalization -- FSK: $4.16B vs. HRZN: $248.89M
FSK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.16B. HRZN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $248.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $180.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSK’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHRZN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HRZN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the long-term than HRZN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HRZN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HRZN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the short-term than HRZN.

Price Growth

FSK (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.80% price change this week, while HRZN (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSK is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

HRZN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.22% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSK($4.16B) has a higher market cap than HRZN($249M). FSK YTD gains are higher at: -23.754 vs. HRZN (-24.980). FSK has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. HRZN (24.7M). HRZN has less debt than FSK: HRZN (425M) vs FSK (8.04B). FSK has higher revenues than HRZN: FSK (315M) vs HRZN (-39.13M).
FSKHRZNFSK / HRZN
Capitalization4.16B249M1,669%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-23.754-24.98095%
P/E Ratio19.03N/A-
Revenue315M-39.13M-805%
Total Cash312M24.7M1,263%
Total Debt8.04B425M1,892%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSK vs HRZN: Fundamental Ratings
FSK
HRZN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5156
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
47100
SMR RATING
1..100
1495
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8688
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2540

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSK's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as HRZN (7). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to HRZN’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HRZN (100). This means that FSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than HRZN’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HRZN (95). This means that FSK’s stock grew significantly faster than HRZN’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Price Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as HRZN (88). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to HRZN’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as HRZN (8). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to HRZN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSKHRZN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRZN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PURE0.08N/A
+5.56%
PURE Bioscience
GCAAF47.77N/A
N/A
Guardian Capital Group Ltd.
ROHCY15.35N/A
N/A
Rohm Co. Ltd.
RROTF2.26N/A
N/A
Roots Corporation
GFIOF43.50-3.12
-6.69%
Gold Fields Ltd.

HRZN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRZN has been loosely correlated with SCM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRZN jumps, then SCM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRZN
1D Price
Change %
HRZN100%
+2.27%
SCM - HRZN
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
FSK - HRZN
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
SLRC - HRZN
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
OCSL - HRZN
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.07%
TPVG - HRZN
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
More