FSK
Price
$10.39
Change
-$0.38 (-3.53%)
Updated
Jun 17, 12:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.02B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HTGC
Price
$15.58
Change
-$0.07 (-0.45%)
Updated
Jun 17, 12:49 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.93B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSK vs HTGC

Header iconFSK vs HTGC Comparison
Open Charts FSK vs HTGCBanner chart's image
FSK vs HTGC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSK vs. HTGC commentary
Jun 17, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSK is a Hold and HTGC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 17, 2026
Stock price -- (FSK: $10.78 vs. HTGC: $15.65)
Brand notoriety: FSK and HTGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSK: 131% vs. HTGC: 60%
Market capitalization -- FSK: $3.02B vs. HTGC: $2.93B
FSK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.02B. HTGC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $163.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHTGC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HTGC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HTGC is a better buy in the long-term than FSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSK’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HTGC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HTGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HTGC is a better buy in the short-term than FSK.

Price Growth

FSK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.83% price change this week, while HTGC (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.

HTGC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.25% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSK($3.02B) and HTGC($2.93B) have the same market capitalization . FSK has higher P/E ratio than HTGC: FSK (271.00) vs HTGC (8.74). HTGC YTD gains are higher at: -11.546 vs. FSK (-23.639). FSK has more cash in the bank: 155M vs. HTGC (57M). HTGC has less debt than FSK: HTGC (2.55B) vs FSK (7.27B). HTGC has higher revenues than FSK: HTGC (434M) vs FSK (-448M).
FSKHTGCFSK / HTGC
Capitalization3.02B2.93B103%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-23.639-11.546205%
P/E Ratio271.008.743,100%
Revenue-448M434M-103%
Total Cash155M57M272%
Total Debt7.27B2.55B285%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSK vs HTGC: Fundamental Ratings
FSK
HTGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
118
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9743
SMR RATING
1..100
7936
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
186
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1785

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HTGC's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as FSK (11). This means that HTGC’s stock grew similarly to FSK’s over the last 12 months.

HTGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSK (97). This means that HTGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSK’s over the last 12 months.

HTGC's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSK (79). This means that HTGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSK’s over the last 12 months.

HTGC's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as FSK (61). This means that HTGC’s stock grew similarly to FSK’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HTGC (86). This means that FSK’s stock grew significantly faster than HTGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSKHTGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HTGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETHD73.672.41
+3.38%
Proshares UltraShort Ether ETF
CANE9.430.11
+1.18%
Teucrium Sugar Fund
EDD5.720.02
+0.35%
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Debt Fund
JPC7.82-0.01
-0.13%
Nuveen Preferred & Income Opportunities Fund
BFRZ27.04-0.08
-0.29%
Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF

FSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSK has been loosely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSK jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSK
1D Price
Change %
FSK100%
-1.37%
ARCC - FSK
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MSDL - FSK
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
OBDC - FSK
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
BCSF - FSK
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
MFIC - FSK
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
More

HTGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTGC has been loosely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HTGC jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTGC
1D Price
Change %
HTGC100%
+1.03%
OBDC - HTGC
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
ARCC - HTGC
66%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PFLT - HTGC
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
MAIN - HTGC
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
TSLX - HTGC
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
More