FSK
Price
$17.49
Change
-$0.15 (-0.85%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.9B
85 days until earnings call
RESCU
Price
$0.55
Change
+$0.41 (+292.86%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSK vs RESCU

Header iconFSK vs RESCU Comparison
Open Charts FSK vs RESCUBanner chart's image
FS KKR Capital
Price$17.49
Change-$0.15 (-0.85%)
Volume$2.1M
Capitalization4.9B
Rescap Liquidating Trust
Price$0.55
Change+$0.41 (+292.86%)
Volume$1.1K
CapitalizationN/A
FSK vs RESCU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RESCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSK vs. RESCU commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSK is a Hold and RESCU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (FSK: $17.49 vs. RESCU: $0.55)
Brand notoriety: FSK and RESCU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSK: 119% vs. RESCU: 100%
Market capitalization -- FSK: $4.9B vs. RESCU: $0
FSK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.9B. RESCU’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSK’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileRESCU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSK’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • RESCU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the long-term than RESCU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RESCU’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RESCU’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RESCU is a better buy in the short-term than FSK.

Price Growth

FSK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.24% price change this week, while RESCU (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSK is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.96% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RESCU YTD gains are higher at: 264.238 vs. FSK (-13.858).
FSKRESCUFSK / RESCU
Capitalization4.9BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-13.858264.238-5%
P/E Ratio22.42N/A-
Revenue613MN/A-
Total Cash472MN/A-
Total Debt7.99BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSK vs RESCU: Fundamental Ratings
FSK
RESCU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23100
SMR RATING
1..100
13100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSK's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as RESCU (35). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RESCU (100). This means that FSK’s stock grew significantly faster than RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RESCU (100). This means that FSK’s stock grew significantly faster than RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

RESCU's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as FSK (65). This means that RESCU’s stock grew similarly to FSK’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RESCU (100). This means that FSK’s stock grew significantly faster than RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSKRESCU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RESCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTOIX22.25-0.01
-0.04%
NYLI Income Builder Class I
TIQRX45.78-0.12
-0.26%
Nuveen Equity Index R
TISBX24.63-0.13
-0.53%
Nuveen Small Cap Blend Idx R6
IYSAX17.01-0.10
-0.58%
Macquarie Smid Cap Core Fund Class A
RYSIX487.59-9.01
-1.81%
Rydex Electronics Inv

FSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSK has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSK jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSK
1D Price
Change %
FSK100%
-0.85%
OBDC - FSK
78%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
MFIC - FSK
74%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
BXSL - FSK
74%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
ARCC - FSK
73%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
GLAD - FSK
73%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
More

RESCU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RESCU has been loosely correlated with SFES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RESCU jumps, then SFES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RESCU
1D Price
Change %
RESCU100%
N/A
SFES - RESCU
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ASXSF - RESCU
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
FSK - RESCU
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
SOLCF - RESCU
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.10%
SLFPY - RESCU
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More