FSK
Price
$19.41
Change
-$1.32 (-6.37%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
5.31B
32 days until earnings call
RESCU
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 14 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

FSK vs RESCU

Header iconFSK vs RESCU Comparison
Open Charts FSK vs RESCUBanner chart's image
FS KKR Capital
Price$19.41
Change-$1.32 (-6.37%)
Volume$5.49M
Capitalization5.31B
Rescap Liquidating Trust
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$650
CapitalizationN/A
FSK vs RESCU Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSK vs. RESCU commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSK is a Hold and RESCU is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FSK: $20.73 vs. RESCU: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: FSK and RESCU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSK: 137% vs. RESCU: 135%
Market capitalization -- FSK: $5.31B vs. RESCU: $0
FSK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.31B. RESCU’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSK’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileRESCU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSK’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • RESCU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the long-term than RESCU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FSK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.71% price change this week, while RESCU (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSK is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.97% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RESCU YTD gains are higher at: -0.662 vs. FSK (-1.307).
FSKRESCUFSK / RESCU
Capitalization5.31BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.307-0.662197%
P/E Ratio7.65N/A-
Revenue779MN/A-
Total Cash223MN/A-
Total Debt8.19BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSK vs RESCU: Fundamental Ratings
FSK
RESCU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6497
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6100
SMR RATING
1..100
11100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4887
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
19100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSK's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RESCU (40). This means that FSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RESCU (100). This means that FSK’s stock grew significantly faster than RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RESCU (100). This means that FSK’s stock grew significantly faster than RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RESCU (87). This means that FSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RESCU (100). This means that FSK’s stock grew significantly faster than RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FUMB20.150.04
+0.20%
First Trust Ultra Short Dur Muncpl ETF
BME38.15-0.27
-0.70%
Blackrock Health Sciences Trust
ASHR26.18-0.27
-1.02%
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A ETF
UJUN32.15-1.28
-3.83%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Jun
LRND30.63-1.48
-4.60%
NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

RESCU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RESCU has been loosely correlated with SFES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RESCU jumps, then SFES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RESCU
1D Price
Change %
RESCU100%
N/A
SFES - RESCU
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.44%
ASXSF - RESCU
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSK - RESCU
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
SOLCF - RESCU
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.72%
SLFPY - RESCU
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More