FSK
Price
$20.78
Change
+$0.20 (+0.97%)
Updated
May 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.31B
90 days until earnings call
SLRC
Price
$16.37
Change
+$0.24 (+1.49%)
Updated
May 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
837.41M
91 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FSK vs SLRC

Header iconFSK vs SLRC Comparison
Open Charts FSK vs SLRCBanner chart's image
FS KKR Capital
Price$20.78
Change+$0.20 (+0.97%)
Volume$13.99K
Capitalization5.31B
SLR Investment
Price$16.37
Change+$0.24 (+1.49%)
Volume$973
Capitalization837.41M
FSK vs SLRC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSK vs. SLRC commentary
May 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSK is a Buy and SLRC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 13, 2025
Stock price -- (FSK: $20.58 vs. SLRC: $16.13)
Brand notoriety: FSK and SLRC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSK: 69% vs. SLRC: 160%
Market capitalization -- FSK: $5.31B vs. SLRC: $837.41M
FSK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.31B. SLRC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $837.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSK’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSLRC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSK’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • SLRC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the long-term than SLRC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLRC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLRC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the short-term than SLRC.

Price Growth

FSK (@Investment Managers) experienced а +5.48% price change this week, while SLRC (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +32.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

SLRC is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+3.34% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSK($5.31B) has a higher market cap than SLRC($837M). SLRC has higher P/E ratio than FSK: SLRC (10.84) vs FSK (7.65). SLRC YTD gains are higher at: 2.298 vs. FSK (-2.021). FSK has more cash in the bank: 223M vs. SLRC (11.9M). SLRC has less debt than FSK: SLRC (1.18B) vs FSK (8.19B). FSK has higher revenues than SLRC: FSK (779M) vs SLRC (86.5M).
FSKSLRCFSK / SLRC
Capitalization5.31B837M634%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.0212.298-88%
P/E Ratio7.6510.8471%
Revenue779M86.5M901%
Total Cash223M11.9M1,874%
Total Debt8.19B1.18B695%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSK vs SLRC: Fundamental Ratings
FSK
SLRC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1423
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1021
SMR RATING
1..100
814
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2039
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
46n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSK's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLRC (84). This means that FSK’s stock grew significantly faster than SLRC’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as SLRC (21). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to SLRC’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as SLRC (14). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to SLRC’s over the last 12 months.

SLRC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as FSK (55). This means that SLRC’s stock grew similarly to FSK’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as SLRC (39). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to SLRC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSKSLRC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CIGRX21.57N/A
N/A
Calamos International Growth A
ECTVX37.38N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Value C
LEVIX3.40N/A
N/A
Lazard US Equity Concentrated Instl
PAAEX15.81N/A
N/A
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R6
BTMPX17.14N/A
N/A
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx Inv P

FSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSK has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSK jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSK
1D Price
Change %
FSK100%
+3.37%
ARCC - FSK
86%
Closely correlated
+2.52%
SLRC - FSK
83%
Closely correlated
+2.09%
MAIN - FSK
83%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
FDUS - FSK
83%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
BCSF - FSK
82%
Closely correlated
+1.52%
More

SLRC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLRC has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLRC jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLRC
1D Price
Change %
SLRC100%
+2.09%
ARCC - SLRC
78%
Closely correlated
+2.52%
FDUS - SLRC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
MFIC - SLRC
76%
Closely correlated
+3.37%
NMFC - SLRC
76%
Closely correlated
+2.59%
CSWC - SLRC
75%
Closely correlated
+3.95%
More