Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSKAX vs FSPGX
FSKAX vs FSPGX Comparison
Open Charts FSKAX vs FSPGX
FSKAX vs FSPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSKAX vs. FSPGX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSKAX is a Hold and FSPGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSKAX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. FSPGX (47.2B). FSKAX pays higher dividends than FSPGX: FSKAX (0.94) vs FSPGX (0.32). FSKAX was incepted earlier than FSPGX: FSKAX (15 years) vs FSPGX (10 years). FSPGX (0.04) is less costly to investors than FSKAX (0.01). FSPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. FSKAX (3.00). FSKAX (0) and FSPGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.28 vs. FSPGX (17.64). FSPGX return over 5 years is better than : 86.80 vs. FSKAX (73.95).
| FSKAX | FSPGX | FSKAX / FSPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.04 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.04 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.164 | 1.318 | 543% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 47.2B | 292% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.32 | 295% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.28 | 17.64 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.92 | 82.14 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.95 | 86.80 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 288.18 | 397.78 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement