Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSKAX vs RWMFX
FSKAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSKAX vs RWMFX
FSKAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSKAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Aug 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSKAX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FSKAX (138B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FSKAX: RWMFX (1.42) vs FSKAX (0.95). FSKAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FSKAX (15 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than FSKAX (0.01). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSKAX (3.00). FSKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: FSKAX (0) vs RWMFX (250). FSKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.79 vs. RWMFX (5.83). FSKAX return over 5 years is better than : 74.97 vs. RWMFX (27.77).
| FSKAX | RWMFX | FSKAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.31 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.31 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.849 | 6.549 | 211% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 218B | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.42 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.79 | 5.83 | 340% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.91 | 31.74 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.97 | 27.77 | 270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 290.98 | 81.94 | 355% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement