Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSKGX vs FSMAX
FSKGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSKGX vs FSMAX
FSKGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSKGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSKGX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. FSKGX (1.12B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FSKGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs FSKGX (0.02). FSKGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FSKGX (9 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). FSKGX (0.46) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSKGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSKGX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. FSKGX (13.16). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. FSKGX (16.19).
| FSKGX | FSMAX | FSKGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.04 | 1,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.04 | 1,314% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.138 | 15.427 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 42.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.50 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.16 | 29.23 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.65 | 73.83 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.19 | 33.65 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 153.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers