Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSKGX vs FSMAX
FSKGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSKGX vs FSMAX
FSKGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSKGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSKGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. FSKGX (1.08B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FSKGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs FSKGX (0.02). FSKGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FSKGX (9 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). FSKGX (0.46) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSKGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSKGX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. FSKGX (-2.02). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. FSKGX (0.05).
| FSKGX | FSMAX | FSKGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.04 | 1,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.04 | 1,314% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.350 | 13.370 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 40.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.50 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.02 | 20.57 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.92 | 55.83 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.05 | 33.18 | 0% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 133.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers