Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSKGX vs PEMGX
FSKGX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSKGX vs PEMGX
FSKGX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSKGX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSKGX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. FSKGX (1.16B). FSKGX pays higher dividends than PEMGX: FSKGX (0.02) vs PEMGX (0.00). FSKGX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FSKGX (9 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). PEMGX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSKGX (0.46). FSKGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). FSKGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PEMGX: FSKGX (0) vs PEMGX (1000). FSKGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.44 vs. PEMGX (-13.38). FSKGX return over 5 years is better than : 9.74 vs. PEMGX (-2.33).
| FSKGX | PEMGX | FSKGX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.90 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.90 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.943 | -4.297 | -231% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 23.7B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.44 | -13.38 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.12 | 11.31 | 417% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.74 | -2.33 | -418% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement