Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSKGX vs PEMGX
FSKGX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSKGX vs PEMGX
FSKGX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSKGX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSKGX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. FSKGX (1.12B). FSKGX pays higher dividends than PEMGX: FSKGX (0.02) vs PEMGX (0.00). FSKGX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FSKGX (9 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). PEMGX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSKGX (0.46). FSKGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). FSKGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PEMGX: FSKGX (0) vs PEMGX (1000). FSKGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.16 vs. PEMGX (-12.39). FSKGX return over 5 years is better than : 16.19 vs. PEMGX (-2.84).
| FSKGX | PEMGX | FSKGX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.90 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.90 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.138 | -6.064 | -233% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 23.7B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.16 | -12.39 | -106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.65 | 14.28 | 432% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.19 | -2.84 | -569% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers