Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSKGX vs RPMGX
FSKGX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSKGX vs RPMGX
FSKGX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSKGX vs. RPMGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSKGX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 22.5B vs. FSKGX (1.12B). FSKGX pays higher dividends than RPMGX: FSKGX (0.02) vs RPMGX (0.00). FSKGX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: FSKGX (9 years) vs RPMGX (34 years). RPMGX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FSKGX (0.46). FSKGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RPMGX (31.50). FSKGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: FSKGX (0) vs RPMGX (2500). FSKGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.16 vs. RPMGX (-0.05). FSKGX return over 5 years is better than : 16.19 vs. RPMGX (-19.79).
| FSKGX | RPMGX | FSKGX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.77 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.77 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.138 | 1.944 | 727% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 22.5B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.16 | -0.05 | -26,110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.65 | 2.23 | 2,769% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.19 | -19.79 | -82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 37.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement