Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSKGX vs RPMGX
FSKGX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSKGX vs RPMGX
FSKGX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSKGX vs. RPMGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSKGX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. FSKGX (1.04B). FSKGX pays higher dividends than RPMGX: FSKGX (0.02) vs RPMGX (0.00). FSKGX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: FSKGX (9 years) vs RPMGX (34 years). RPMGX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FSKGX (0.46). FSKGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RPMGX (31.50). FSKGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: FSKGX (0) vs RPMGX (2500). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.56 vs. FSKGX (-8.86). FSKGX return over 5 years is better than : -7.89 vs. RPMGX (-24.68).
| FSKGX | RPMGX | FSKGX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.77 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.77 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.621 | -0.051 | 1,209% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 21.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.86 | -6.56 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.24 | -1.58 | -2,357% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.89 | -24.68 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement