Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSKGX vs RPTIX
FSKGX vs RPTIX Comparison
Open Charts FSKGX vs RPTIX
FSKGX vs RPTIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSKGX vs. RPTIX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSKGX is a Hold and RPTIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. FSKGX (1.08B). RPTIX pays higher dividends than FSKGX: RPTIX (0.11) vs FSKGX (0.02). FSKGX was incepted earlier than RPTIX: FSKGX (9 years) vs RPTIX (11 years). RPTIX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FSKGX (0.46). FSKGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RPTIX (31.50). FSKGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: FSKGX (0) vs RPTIX (500000). RPTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.78 vs. FSKGX (1.01). FSKGX return over 5 years is better than : 0.16 vs. RPTIX (-17.83).
| FSKGX | RPTIX | FSKGX / RPTIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.63 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.63 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.489 | 6.148 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 22.6B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.11 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.01 | 1.78 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.43 | 5.65 | 857% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.16 | -17.83 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers