Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSKLX vs VTMGX
FSKLX vs VTMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSKLX vs VTMGX
FSKLX vs VTMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSKLX vs. VTMGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSKLX is a Buy and VTMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMGX has more cash in the bank: 316B vs. FSKLX (7.92B). VTMGX pays higher dividends than FSKLX: VTMGX (2.54) vs FSKLX (2.36). FSKLX was incepted earlier than VTMGX: FSKLX (11 years) vs VTMGX (27 years). FSKLX (0.16) is less costly to investors than VTMGX (0.05). FSKLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. VTMGX (4.00). FSKLX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMGX: FSKLX (0) vs VTMGX (3000). VTMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.09 vs. FSKLX (17.99). VTMGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.62 vs. FSKLX (35.17).
| FSKLX | VTMGX | FSKLX / VTMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.05 | 320% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.05 | 320% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.783 | 13.666 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.92B | 316B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.36 | 2.54 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.99 | 27.09 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.30 | 53.02 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.17 | 40.62 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.01 | 105.36 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers