Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSKLX vs VTMGX
FSKLX vs VTMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSKLX vs VTMGX
FSKLX vs VTMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSKLX vs. VTMGX commentary
Jun 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSKLX is a Hold and VTMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMGX has more cash in the bank: 317B vs. FSKLX (7.47B). VTMGX pays higher dividends than FSKLX: VTMGX (2.60) vs FSKLX (2.46). FSKLX was incepted earlier than VTMGX: FSKLX (11 years) vs VTMGX (27 years). FSKLX (0.16) is less costly to investors than VTMGX (0.05). FSKLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. VTMGX (4.00). FSKLX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMGX: FSKLX (0) vs VTMGX (3000). VTMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.47 vs. FSKLX (10.13). VTMGX return over 5 years is better than : 45.03 vs. FSKLX (30.23).
| FSKLX | VTMGX | FSKLX / VTMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.05 | 320% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.05 | 320% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.882 | 15.963 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.47B | 317B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 2.60 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.13 | 30.47 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.31 | 55.34 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.23 | 45.03 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.48 | 112.78 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers