Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSKLX vs VTMGX
FSKLX vs VTMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSKLX vs VTMGX
FSKLX vs VTMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSKLX vs. VTMGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSKLX is a Hold and VTMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMGX has more cash in the bank: 316B vs. FSKLX (7.56B). VTMGX (2.52) and FSKLX (2.48) have matching dividends . FSKLX was incepted earlier than VTMGX: FSKLX (11 years) vs VTMGX (27 years). FSKLX (0.16) is less costly to investors than VTMGX (0.05). FSKLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. VTMGX (4.00). FSKLX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMGX: FSKLX (0) vs VTMGX (3000). VTMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.39 vs. FSKLX (12.64). VTMGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.40 vs. FSKLX (31.12).
| FSKLX | VTMGX | FSKLX / VTMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.05 | 320% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.05 | 320% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.677 | 13.766 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.56B | 316B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 2.52 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.64 | 25.39 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.17 | 52.95 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.12 | 40.40 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.49 | 107.67 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement