Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs FSRBX
FSLBX vs FSRBX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs FSRBX
FSLBX vs FSRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. FSRBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and FSRBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 942M vs. FSRBX (515M). FSRBX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: FSRBX (1.95) vs FSLBX (0.69). FSLBX was incepted earlier than FSRBX: FSLBX (41 years) vs FSRBX (40 years). FSRBX (0.69) and FSLBX (0.66) have similar cost to investors . FSRBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX (0) and FSRBX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSRBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.68 vs. FSLBX (-7.92). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 54.02 vs. FSRBX (49.89).
| FSLBX | FSRBX | FSLBX / FSRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.69 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.69 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.186 | 11.889 | -44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 942M | 515M | 183% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.95 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.92 | 18.68 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.02 | 99.41 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.02 | 49.89 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 217.49 | 74.45 | 292% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement