Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs FSRBX
FSLBX vs FSRBX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs FSRBX
FSLBX vs FSRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. FSRBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and FSRBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 992M vs. FSRBX (507M). FSRBX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: FSRBX (1.99) vs FSLBX (0.65). FSLBX was incepted earlier than FSRBX: FSLBX (41 years) vs FSRBX (40 years). FSRBX (0.69) and FSLBX (0.66) have similar cost to investors . FSRBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX (0) and FSRBX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSRBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.74 vs. FSLBX (-12.56). FSRBX return over 5 years is better than : 51.79 vs. FSLBX (47.47).
| FSLBX | FSRBX | FSLBX / FSRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.69 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.69 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.512 | 12.243 | -61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 992M | 507M | 196% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.99 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.56 | 12.74 | -99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.20 | 94.26 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.47 | 51.79 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 208.69 | 73.97 | 282% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement