Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs FSVLX
FSLBX vs FSVLX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs FSVLX
FSLBX vs FSVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. FSVLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and FSVLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 992M vs. FSVLX (92.4M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than FSVLX: FSLBX (0.65) vs FSVLX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than FSVLX: FSLBX (41 years) vs FSVLX (41 years). FSVLX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). FSVLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 239.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX (0) and FSVLX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.56 vs. FSVLX (-16.21). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.47 vs. FSVLX (-27.88).
| FSLBX | FSVLX | FSLBX / FSVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.74 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.74 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.512 | -14.102 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 992M | 92.4M | 1,074% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.56 | -16.21 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.20 | 14.08 | 371% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.47 | -27.88 | -170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 208.69 | 45.90 | 455% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement