Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs HLFNX
FSLBX vs HLFNX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs HLFNX
FSLBX vs HLFNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. HLFNX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and HLFNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 941M vs. HLFNX (27.7M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than HLFNX: FSLBX (0.72) vs HLFNX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than HLFNX: FSLBX (41 years) vs HLFNX (29 years). HLFNX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). HLFNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLFNX: FSLBX (0) vs HLFNX (2500). HLFNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. FSLBX (-7.38). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 49.51 vs. HLFNX (-3.45).
| FSLBX | HLFNX | FSLBX / HLFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.88 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.88 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.876 | -5.567 | 231% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 941M | 27.7M | 3,397% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.38 | 1.42 | -519% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.92 | 65.18 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.51 | -3.45 | -1,436% |
| Returns for 10 years | 195.40 | 108.44 | 180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement