Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs HLFNX
FSLBX vs HLFNX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs HLFNX
FSLBX vs HLFNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. HLFNX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and HLFNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 992M vs. HLFNX (29.1M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than HLFNX: FSLBX (0.65) vs HLFNX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than HLFNX: FSLBX (41 years) vs HLFNX (30 years). HLFNX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). HLFNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLFNX: FSLBX (0) vs HLFNX (2500). HLFNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.91 vs. FSLBX (-12.56). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.47 vs. HLFNX (2.63).
| FSLBX | HLFNX | FSLBX / HLFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.88 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.88 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.512 | 3.370 | -223% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 992M | 29.1M | 3,409% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.56 | -2.91 | 431% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.20 | 69.23 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.47 | 2.63 | 1,802% |
| Returns for 10 years | 208.69 | 125.54 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement