Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs HSSAX
FSLBX vs HSSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs HSSAX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$200.45
Change+$0.04 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd A
Price$32.89
Change-$0.11 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.97M
FSLBX vs HSSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. HSSAX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and HSSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.45B vs. HSSAX (52M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than HSSAX: FSLBX (0.64) vs HSSAX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than HSSAX: FSLBX (40 years) vs HSSAX (29 years). HSSAX (1.77) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). HSSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSLBX (16.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSAX: FSLBX (0) vs HSSAX (2000). FSLBX (25.93) and HSSAX (24.95) have marching annual gain over last year. FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 165.24 vs. HSSAX (34.40).
| FSLBX | HSSAX | FSLBX / HSSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.77 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.77 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.359 | 16.856 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 52M | 2,783% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.93 | 24.95 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 95.31 | 34.16 | 279% |
| Returns for 5 years | 165.24 | 34.40 | 480% |
| Returns for 10 years | 220.85 | 19.02 | 1,161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement