Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs HSSAX
FSLBX vs HSSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs HSSAX
FSLBX vs HSSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. HSSAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and HSSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 942M vs. HSSAX (48.1M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than HSSAX: FSLBX (0.69) vs HSSAX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than HSSAX: FSLBX (41 years) vs HSSAX (30 years). HSSAX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). HSSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSAX: FSLBX (0) vs HSSAX (2000). HSSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.70 vs. FSLBX (-7.92). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 54.02 vs. HSSAX (-25.55).
| FSLBX | HSSAX | FSLBX / HSSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.79 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.79 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.186 | 7.202 | -72% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 942M | 48.1M | 1,958% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.92 | 9.70 | -82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.02 | 70.68 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.02 | -25.55 | -211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 217.49 | 17.47 | 1,245% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers