Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs HSSAX
FSLBX vs HSSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs HSSAX
FSLBX vs HSSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. HSSAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and HSSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 992M vs. HSSAX (46.5M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than HSSAX: FSLBX (0.65) vs HSSAX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than HSSAX: FSLBX (41 years) vs HSSAX (30 years). HSSAX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). HSSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSAX: FSLBX (0) vs HSSAX (2000). HSSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.69 vs. FSLBX (-12.56). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.47 vs. HSSAX (-32.42).
| FSLBX | HSSAX | FSLBX / HSSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.79 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.79 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.512 | 4.011 | -187% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 992M | 46.5M | 2,133% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.56 | -0.69 | 1,810% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.20 | 63.99 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.47 | -32.42 | -146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 208.69 | 13.13 | 1,590% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers