Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs HSSCX
FSLBX vs HSSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs HSSCX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$199.95
Change-$0.95 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.47B
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd C
Price$26.13
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.26M
FSLBX vs HSSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. HSSCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and HSSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.47B vs. HSSCX (51.3M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than HSSCX: FSLBX (0.62) vs HSSCX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than HSSCX: FSLBX (40 years) vs HSSCX (25 years). HSSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). HSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSLBX (16.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSCX: FSLBX (0) vs HSSCX (2000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.35 vs. HSSCX (22.57). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 153.63 vs. HSSCX (26.58).
| FSLBX | HSSCX | FSLBX / HSSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.629 | 15.269 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 51.3M | 2,873% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.35 | 22.57 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.57 | 21.55 | 425% |
| Returns for 5 years | 153.63 | 26.58 | 578% |
| Returns for 10 years | 205.52 | 7.20 | 2,853% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement