Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs HSSCX
FSLBX vs HSSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs HSSCX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$179.58
Change+$0.12 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd C
Price$23.14
Change-$0.04 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.14M
FSLBX vs HSSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. HSSCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and HSSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. HSSCX (45.1M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than HSSCX: FSLBX (0.67) vs HSSCX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than HSSCX: FSLBX (40 years) vs HSSCX (25 years). HSSCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). HSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSLBX (16.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSCX: FSLBX (0) vs HSSCX (2000). HSSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.93 vs. FSLBX (-4.07). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 113.24 vs. HSSCX (-1.28).
| FSLBX | HSSCX | FSLBX / HSSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.44 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.44 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.177 | 2.295 | -51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.28B | 45.1M | 2,840% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.07 | -2.93 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.20 | 25.71 | 254% |
| Returns for 5 years | 113.24 | -1.28 | -8,827% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.02 | -13.55 | -1,225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement