Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs HSSCX
FSLBX vs HSSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs HSSCX
FSLBX vs HSSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. HSSCX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and HSSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 942M vs. HSSCX (48.1M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than HSSCX: FSLBX (0.69) vs HSSCX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than HSSCX: FSLBX (41 years) vs HSSCX (26 years). HSSCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). HSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSCX: FSLBX (0) vs HSSCX (2000). HSSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.94 vs. FSLBX (-7.92). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 54.02 vs. HSSCX (-28.41).
| FSLBX | HSSCX | FSLBX / HSSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.44 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.44 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.186 | 6.651 | -78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 942M | 48.1M | 1,958% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.92 | 8.94 | -89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.02 | 67.36 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.02 | -28.41 | -190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 217.49 | 5.30 | 4,105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement