Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs HSSCX
FSLBX vs HSSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs HSSCX
FSLBX vs HSSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. HSSCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and HSSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 942M vs. HSSCX (48.6M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than HSSCX: FSLBX (0.69) vs HSSCX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than HSSCX: FSLBX (41 years) vs HSSCX (26 years). HSSCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). HSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSCX: FSLBX (0) vs HSSCX (2000). HSSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.05 vs. FSLBX (-13.73). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 51.36 vs. HSSCX (-27.44).
| FSLBX | HSSCX | FSLBX / HSSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.44 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.44 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.596 | 5.305 | -162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 942M | 48.6M | 1,938% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.73 | 10.05 | -137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.05 | 49.30 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.36 | -27.44 | -187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 220.74 | 8.19 | 2,695% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers