Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs ICFAX
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs ICFAX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$197.06
Change+$1.40 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
ICON Consumer Select Investor
Price$9.70
Change+$0.09 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.92M
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. ICFAX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and ICFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.38B vs. ICFAX (31.9M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than ICFAX: FSLBX (0.65) vs ICFAX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than ICFAX: FSLBX (40 years) vs ICFAX (15 years). ICFAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). FSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. ICFAX (15.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICFAX: FSLBX (0) vs ICFAX (1000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.60 vs. ICFAX (-6.37). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 168.52 vs. ICFAX (12.01).
| FSLBX | ICFAX | FSLBX / ICFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.515 | 1.571 | 542% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.38B | 31.9M | 4,320% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.60 | -6.37 | -543% |
| Returns for 3 years | 107.49 | -2.12 | -5,073% |
| Returns for 5 years | 168.52 | 12.01 | 1,403% |
| Returns for 10 years | 176.17 | 13.46 | 1,309% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement