Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs ICFAX
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs ICFAX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$179.56
Change-$3.68 (-2.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
ICON Consumer Select Investor
Price$9.27
Change-$0.23 (-2.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.84M
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. ICFAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and ICFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. ICFAX (30.8M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than ICFAX: FSLBX (0.70) vs ICFAX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than ICFAX: FSLBX (40 years) vs ICFAX (15 years). ICFAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). FSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. ICFAX (15.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICFAX: FSLBX (0) vs ICFAX (1000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.91 vs. ICFAX (-12.96). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 145.28 vs. ICFAX (3.00).
| FSLBX | ICFAX | FSLBX / ICFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.122 | -2.932 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 30.8M | 4,240% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.91 | -12.96 | -192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.71 | -6.83 | -1,371% |
| Returns for 5 years | 145.28 | 3.00 | 4,843% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.47 | 7.33 | 1,971% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement