Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs ICFAX
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs ICFAX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$205.73
Change+$1.02 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
ICON Consumer Select Investor
Price$9.66
Change-$0.08 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.44M
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. ICFAX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and ICFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.38B vs. ICFAX (31.4M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than ICFAX: FSLBX (0.65) vs ICFAX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than ICFAX: FSLBX (40 years) vs ICFAX (15 years). ICFAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). FSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. ICFAX (15.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICFAX: FSLBX (0) vs ICFAX (1000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.80 vs. ICFAX (-3.56). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 166.89 vs. ICFAX (6.68).
| FSLBX | ICFAX | FSLBX / ICFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.64 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.289 | 1.990 | 668% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.38B | 31.4M | 4,389% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.80 | -3.56 | -920% |
| Returns for 3 years | 95.82 | -5.98 | -1,601% |
| Returns for 5 years | 166.89 | 6.68 | 2,498% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.29 | 13.16 | 1,424% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement