Ad is loading...
FSLBX vs ICFAX
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs ICFAX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$158.96
Change-$14.13 (-8.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
ICON Consumer Select Investor
Price$8.69
Change-$0.53 (-5.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.26M
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. ICFAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and ICFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. ICFAX (32.3M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than ICFAX: FSLBX (0.74) vs ICFAX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than ICFAX: FSLBX (40 years) vs ICFAX (15 years). ICFAX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.70). FSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. ICFAX (23.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICFAX: FSLBX (0) vs ICFAX (1000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.40 vs. ICFAX (-13.59). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 192.17 vs. ICFAX (36.80).
| FSLBX | ICFAX | FSLBX / ICFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.52 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.52 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.718 | -3.455 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 32.3M | 4,080% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.40 | -13.59 | -143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.09 | -20.79 | -222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 192.17 | 36.80 | 522% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.92 | 10.89 | 1,322% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...