Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs ICFAX
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs ICFAX
FSLBX vs ICFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. ICFAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and ICFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 992M vs. ICFAX (24M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than ICFAX: FSLBX (0.65) vs ICFAX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than ICFAX: FSLBX (41 years) vs ICFAX (16 years). ICFAX (1.72) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). ICFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICFAX: FSLBX (0) vs ICFAX (1000). ICFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.19 vs. FSLBX (-12.56). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.47 vs. ICFAX (-28.95).
| FSLBX | ICFAX | FSLBX / ICFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.72 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.72 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.512 | 0.442 | -1,698% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 992M | 24M | 4,133% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.56 | -10.19 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.20 | -10.45 | -499% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.47 | -28.95 | -164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 208.69 | 20.74 | 1,006% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement