Ad is loading...
FSLBX vs ICFSX
FSLBX vs ICFSX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs ICFSX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$173.09
Change+$2.87 (+1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
ICON Consumer Select Institutional
Price$9.40
Change+$0.10 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.99M
FSLBX vs ICFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. ICFSX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and ICFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. ICFSX (32M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than ICFSX: FSLBX (0.74) vs ICFSX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than ICFSX: FSLBX (40 years) vs ICFSX (28 years). ICFSX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.70). FSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. ICFSX (23.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICFSX: FSLBX (0) vs ICFSX (1000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.28 vs. ICFSX (-14.29). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 187.33 vs. ICFSX (37.90).
| FSLBX | ICFSX | FSLBX / ICFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.27 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.27 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.297 | -4.419 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 32M | 4,119% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.28 | -14.29 | -128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.98 | -20.24 | -217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 187.33 | 37.90 | 494% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.71 | 13.42 | 1,041% |