Ad is loading...
FSLBX vs ICFSX
FSLBX vs ICFSX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs ICFSX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$164.91
Change+$4.88 (+3.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
ICON Consumer Select Institutional
Price$8.83
Change+$0.09 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.2M
FSLBX vs ICFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. ICFSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and ICFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. ICFSX (29.2M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than ICFSX: FSLBX (0.74) vs ICFSX (0.00). FSLBX was incepted earlier than ICFSX: FSLBX (40 years) vs ICFSX (28 years). ICFSX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.70). FSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. ICFSX (23.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICFSX: FSLBX (0) vs ICFSX (1000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.02 vs. ICFSX (-17.62). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 143.41 vs. ICFSX (14.50).
| FSLBX | ICFSX | FSLBX / ICFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.27 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.27 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.314 | -10.175 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 29.2M | 4,514% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.02 | -17.62 | -63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.89 | -22.99 | -204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 143.41 | 14.50 | 989% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.00 | 5.84 | 2,070% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...