Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs ICFSX
FSLBX vs ICFSX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs ICFSX
FSLBX vs ICFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. ICFSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and ICFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 872M vs. ICFSX (27M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than ICFSX: FSLBX (0.76) vs ICFSX (0.10). FSLBX was incepted earlier than ICFSX: FSLBX (41 years) vs ICFSX (29 years). ICFSX (1.47) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). ICFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICFSX: FSLBX (0) vs ICFSX (1000). ICFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.95 vs. FSLBX (-13.12). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.27 vs. ICFSX (-26.01).
| FSLBX | ICFSX | FSLBX / ICFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.47 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.47 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.456 | 2.922 | -358% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 872M | 27M | 3,230% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.10 | 726% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.12 | -1.95 | 673% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.62 | -7.93 | -638% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.27 | -26.01 | -201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 212.59 | 31.75 | 669% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement