Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs ICFSX
FSLBX vs ICFSX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs ICFSX
FSLBX vs ICFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. ICFSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and ICFSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 992M vs. ICFSX (24M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than ICFSX: FSLBX (0.65) vs ICFSX (0.10). FSLBX was incepted earlier than ICFSX: FSLBX (41 years) vs ICFSX (29 years). ICFSX (1.47) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). ICFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICFSX: FSLBX (0) vs ICFSX (1000). ICFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.79 vs. FSLBX (-12.56). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.47 vs. ICFSX (-27.50).
| FSLBX | ICFSX | FSLBX / ICFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.47 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.47 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.512 | 0.541 | -1,388% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 992M | 24M | 4,133% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.10 | 642% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.56 | -9.79 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.20 | -9.36 | -558% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.47 | -27.50 | -173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 208.69 | 25.00 | 835% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement