Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs PFSAX
FSLBX vs PFSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs PFSAX
FSLBX vs PFSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. PFSAX commentary
Aug 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and PFSAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 942M vs. PFSAX (160M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than PFSAX: FSLBX (0.69) vs PFSAX (0.58). FSLBX was incepted earlier than PFSAX: FSLBX (41 years) vs PFSAX (27 years). PFSAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). PFSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFSAX: FSLBX (0) vs PFSAX (1000). PFSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.85 vs. FSLBX (-6.34). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.71 vs. PFSAX (13.15).
| FSLBX | PFSAX | FSLBX / PFSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.31 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.31 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.509 | 10.098 | -25% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 942M | 160M | 589% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.58 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.34 | 1.85 | -343% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.82 | 51.57 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.71 | 13.15 | 401% |
| Returns for 10 years | 223.68 | 149.44 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers