Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs PFSQX
FSLBX vs PFSQX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs PFSQX
FSLBX vs PFSQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. PFSQX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and PFSQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 992M vs. PFSQX (156M). PFSQX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: PFSQX (0.80) vs FSLBX (0.65). FSLBX was incepted earlier than PFSQX: FSLBX (41 years) vs PFSQX (9 years). PFSQX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). PFSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX (0) and PFSQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PFSQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. FSLBX (-11.10). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.49 vs. PFSQX (16.34).
| FSLBX | PFSQX | FSLBX / PFSQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.00 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.68 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.250 | 7.586 | -96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 992M | 156M | 636% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.80 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.10 | 0.49 | -2,272% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.79 | 46.02 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.49 | 16.34 | 291% |
| Returns for 10 years | 208.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement