Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs PFSZX
FSLBX vs PFSZX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs PFSZX
FSLBX vs PFSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. PFSZX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and PFSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 992M vs. PFSZX (156M). PFSZX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: PFSZX (0.77) vs FSLBX (0.65). FSLBX was incepted earlier than PFSZX: FSLBX (41 years) vs PFSZX (27 years). PFSZX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). PFSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX (0) and PFSZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PFSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.11 vs. FSLBX (-12.56). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.47 vs. PFSZX (16.92).
| FSLBX | PFSZX | FSLBX / PFSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.04 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.04 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.512 | 7.758 | -97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 992M | 156M | 636% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.77 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.56 | -0.11 | 10,949% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.20 | 47.22 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.47 | 16.92 | 281% |
| Returns for 10 years | 208.69 | 149.93 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement