Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs PGFMX
FSLBX vs PGFMX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs PGFMX
FSLBX vs PGFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. PGFMX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and PGFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 992M vs. PGFMX (5.9M). PGFMX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: PGFMX (3.34) vs FSLBX (0.65). FSLBX was incepted earlier than PGFMX: FSLBX (41 years) vs PGFMX (2 years). PGFMX (3.39) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). PGFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX (0) and PGFMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PGFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.48 vs. FSLBX (-9.37).
| FSLBX | PGFMX | FSLBX / PGFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.35 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 3.39 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 2 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.239 | 8.517 | -73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 992M | 5.9M | 16,819% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 3.34 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.37 | 9.48 | -99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.94 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.50 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 207.32 | 16.09 | 1,288% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement