Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs PSSRX
FSLBX vs PSSRX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs PSSRX
FSLBX vs PSSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. PSSRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and PSSRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 992M vs. PSSRX (156M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than PSSRX: FSLBX (0.65) vs PSSRX (0.34). FSLBX was incepted earlier than PSSRX: FSLBX (41 years) vs PSSRX (15 years). PSSRX (1.84) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). PSSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX (0) and PSSRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PSSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.14 vs. FSLBX (-12.56). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.47 vs. PSSRX (12.49).
| FSLBX | PSSRX | FSLBX / PSSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.59 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.84 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.512 | 7.275 | -103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 992M | 156M | 636% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.34 | 189% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.56 | -1.14 | 1,104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.20 | 43.31 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.47 | 12.49 | 380% |
| Returns for 10 years | 208.69 | 135.37 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement