Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs RYFAX
FSLBX vs RYFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs RYFAX
FSLBX vs RYFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. RYFAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and RYFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 872M vs. RYFAX (12.2M). RYFAX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: RYFAX (1.39) vs FSLBX (0.76). FSLBX was incepted earlier than RYFAX: FSLBX (41 years) vs RYFAX (28 years). RYFAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). RYFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 446.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYFAX: FSLBX (0) vs RYFAX (2500). RYFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.69 vs. FSLBX (-13.12). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.27 vs. RYFAX (14.29).
| FSLBX | RYFAX | FSLBX / RYFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.65 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.70 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.456 | 4.204 | -249% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 872M | 12.2M | 7,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.39 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.12 | 6.69 | -196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.62 | 56.70 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.27 | 14.29 | 366% |
| Returns for 10 years | 212.59 | 96.04 | 221% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers