Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs RYFAX
FSLBX vs RYFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs RYFAX
FSLBX vs RYFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. RYFAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and RYFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 992M vs. RYFAX (20.9M). RYFAX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: RYFAX (1.31) vs FSLBX (0.65). FSLBX was incepted earlier than RYFAX: FSLBX (41 years) vs RYFAX (28 years). RYFAX (1.73) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). RYFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 446.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYFAX: FSLBX (0) vs RYFAX (2500). RYFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.32 vs. FSLBX (-12.56). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.47 vs. RYFAX (11.46).
| FSLBX | RYFAX | FSLBX / RYFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.68 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.73 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.512 | 4.390 | -171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 992M | 20.9M | 4,746% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.31 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.56 | 3.32 | -378% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.20 | 58.41 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.47 | 11.46 | 414% |
| Returns for 10 years | 208.69 | 95.75 | 218% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement