Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs RYFAX
FSLBX vs RYFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs RYFAX
FSLBX vs RYFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. RYFAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and RYFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 942M vs. RYFAX (22.4M). RYFAX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: RYFAX (1.32) vs FSLBX (0.69). FSLBX was incepted earlier than RYFAX: FSLBX (41 years) vs RYFAX (28 years). RYFAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). RYFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 446.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYFAX: FSLBX (0) vs RYFAX (2500). RYFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.42 vs. FSLBX (-13.73). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 51.36 vs. RYFAX (15.09).
| FSLBX | RYFAX | FSLBX / RYFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.65 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.70 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.596 | 5.685 | -151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 942M | 22.4M | 4,205% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.32 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.73 | 8.42 | -163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.05 | 54.68 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.36 | 15.09 | 340% |
| Returns for 10 years | 220.74 | 99.11 | 223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers