Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs RYFAX
FSLBX vs RYFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs RYFAX
FSLBX vs RYFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. RYFAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and RYFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 941M vs. RYFAX (7.72M). RYFAX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: RYFAX (1.43) vs FSLBX (0.72). FSLBX was incepted earlier than RYFAX: FSLBX (41 years) vs RYFAX (28 years). RYFAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). RYFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 280.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYFAX: FSLBX (0) vs RYFAX (2500). RYFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.09 vs. FSLBX (-7.38). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 49.51 vs. RYFAX (4.86).
| FSLBX | RYFAX | FSLBX / RYFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.65 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.70 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.876 | -2.612 | 493% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 941M | 7.72M | 12,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.43 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.38 | 4.09 | -180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.92 | 55.80 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.51 | 4.86 | 1,019% |
| Returns for 10 years | 195.40 | 85.58 | 228% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement