Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs RYFCX
FSLBX vs RYFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs RYFCX
FSLBX vs RYFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. RYFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and RYFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 941M vs. RYFCX (11.2M). RYFCX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: RYFCX (1.75) vs FSLBX (0.72). FSLBX was incepted earlier than RYFCX: FSLBX (41 years) vs RYFCX (25 years). RYFCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). RYFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 280.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYFCX: FSLBX (0) vs RYFCX (2500). RYFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. FSLBX (-7.77). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 51.40 vs. RYFCX (2.53).
| FSLBX | RYFCX | FSLBX / RYFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.39 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.44 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.174 | -0.414 | 2,942% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 941M | 11.2M | 8,402% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.75 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.77 | 6.03 | -129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.96 | 56.48 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.40 | 2.53 | 2,028% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.63 | 77.82 | 292% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement