Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs RYFCX
FSLBX vs RYFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs RYFCX
FSLBX vs RYFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. RYFCX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and RYFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 942M vs. RYFCX (21.7M). RYFCX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: RYFCX (1.62) vs FSLBX (0.69). FSLBX was incepted earlier than RYFCX: FSLBX (41 years) vs RYFCX (25 years). RYFCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). RYFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 446.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYFCX: FSLBX (0) vs RYFCX (2500). RYFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.97 vs. FSLBX (-8.12). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.54 vs. RYFCX (5.63).
| FSLBX | RYFCX | FSLBX / RYFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.39 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.44 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.289 | 7.835 | -29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 942M | 21.7M | 4,341% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.62 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.12 | 8.97 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.80 | 62.54 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.54 | 5.63 | 986% |
| Returns for 10 years | 229.97 | 78.76 | 292% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement