Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs RYFCX
FSLBX vs RYFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs RYFCX
FSLBX vs RYFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. RYFCX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and RYFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 992M vs. RYFCX (23.2M). RYFCX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: RYFCX (1.61) vs FSLBX (0.65). FSLBX was incepted earlier than RYFCX: FSLBX (41 years) vs RYFCX (25 years). RYFCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). RYFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 446.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYFCX: FSLBX (0) vs RYFCX (2500). RYFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.23 vs. FSLBX (-6.73). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 49.15 vs. RYFCX (2.21).
| FSLBX | RYFCX | FSLBX / RYFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.39 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.44 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.887 | 4.939 | -99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 992M | 23.2M | 4,276% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.61 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.73 | 5.23 | -129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.77 | 56.09 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.15 | 2.21 | 2,229% |
| Returns for 10 years | 212.31 | 70.01 | 303% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement