Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs RYFIX
FSLBX vs RYFIX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs RYFIX
FSLBX vs RYFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. RYFIX commentary
Aug 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and RYFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 942M vs. RYFIX (21.9M). RYFIX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: RYFIX (1.14) vs FSLBX (0.69). FSLBX was incepted earlier than RYFIX: FSLBX (41 years) vs RYFIX (28 years). RYFIX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). RYFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 446.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYFIX: FSLBX (0) vs RYFIX (2500). RYFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.01 vs. FSLBX (-8.96). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 54.11 vs. RYFIX (18.46).
| FSLBX | RYFIX | FSLBX / RYFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.40 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.45 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.185 | 8.442 | -38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 942M | 21.9M | 4,301% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.14 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.96 | 10.01 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.27 | 67.41 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.11 | 18.46 | 293% |
| Returns for 10 years | 226.95 | 112.74 | 201% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers