Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs RYFIX
FSLBX vs RYFIX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs RYFIX
FSLBX vs RYFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. RYFIX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and RYFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 941M vs. RYFIX (7.96M). RYFIX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: RYFIX (1.23) vs FSLBX (0.72). FSLBX was incepted earlier than RYFIX: FSLBX (41 years) vs RYFIX (28 years). RYFIX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). RYFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 280.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYFIX: FSLBX (0) vs RYFIX (2500). RYFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.97 vs. FSLBX (-8.03). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.88 vs. RYFIX (12.81).
| FSLBX | RYFIX | FSLBX / RYFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.40 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.45 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.268 | 0.577 | -2,127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 941M | 7.96M | 11,825% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.23 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.03 | 6.97 | -115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.50 | 58.32 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.88 | 12.81 | 397% |
| Returns for 10 years | 215.83 | 109.77 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers