Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs RYFIX
FSLBX vs RYFIX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs RYFIX
FSLBX vs RYFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. RYFIX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and RYFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 872M vs. RYFIX (12.2M). RYFIX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: RYFIX (1.20) vs FSLBX (0.76). FSLBX was incepted earlier than RYFIX: FSLBX (41 years) vs RYFIX (28 years). RYFIX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). RYFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 280.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYFIX: FSLBX (0) vs RYFIX (2500). RYFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.23 vs. FSLBX (-14.81). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.79 vs. RYFIX (18.70).
| FSLBX | RYFIX | FSLBX / RYFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.40 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.45 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.603 | 3.933 | -320% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 872M | 12.2M | 7,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.20 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.81 | 5.23 | -283% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.18 | 61.67 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.79 | 18.70 | 256% |
| Returns for 10 years | 220.60 | 111.68 | 198% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement