Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs RYFNX
FSLBX vs RYFNX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs RYFNX
FSLBX vs RYFNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. RYFNX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and RYFNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 872M vs. RYFNX (12.2M). RYFNX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: RYFNX (1.34) vs FSLBX (0.76). FSLBX was incepted earlier than RYFNX: FSLBX (41 years) vs RYFNX (22 years). RYFNX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). RYFNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 280.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYFNX: FSLBX (0) vs RYFNX (2500). RYFNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.95 vs. FSLBX (-14.81). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.79 vs. RYFNX (15.00).
| FSLBX | RYFNX | FSLBX / RYFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.64 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.69 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.603 | 3.791 | -332% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 872M | 12.2M | 7,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.34 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.81 | 4.95 | -299% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.18 | 60.44 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.79 | 15.00 | 319% |
| Returns for 10 years | 220.60 | 101.86 | 217% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers