Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs RYKAX
FSLBX vs RYKAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs RYKAX
FSLBX vs RYKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. RYKAX commentary
Aug 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and RYKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 942M vs. RYKAX (10.7M). RYKAX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: RYKAX (3.45) vs FSLBX (0.69). FSLBX was incepted earlier than RYKAX: FSLBX (41 years) vs RYKAX (28 years). RYKAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYKAX: FSLBX (0) vs RYKAX (2500). RYKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.90 vs. FSLBX (-11.44). RYKAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.16 vs. FSLBX (48.62).
| FSLBX | RYKAX | FSLBX / RYKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.64 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.69 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.412 | 14.877 | -43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 942M | 10.7M | 8,804% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 3.45 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.44 | 31.90 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.97 | 94.95 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.62 | 52.16 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 219.08 | 165.90 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement