Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs RYKCX
FSLBX vs RYKCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs RYKCX
FSLBX vs RYKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. RYKCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and RYKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 992M vs. RYKCX (8.98M). RYKCX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: RYKCX (4.15) vs FSLBX (0.65). FSLBX was incepted earlier than RYKCX: FSLBX (41 years) vs RYKCX (25 years). RYKCX (2.45) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYKCX: FSLBX (0) vs RYKCX (2500). RYKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.13 vs. FSLBX (-12.56). RYKCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.19 vs. FSLBX (47.47).
| FSLBX | RYKCX | FSLBX / RYKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.40 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.45 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.512 | 12.265 | -61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 992M | 8.98M | 11,042% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 4.15 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.56 | 19.13 | -66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.20 | 99.59 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.47 | 51.19 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 208.69 | 136.59 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement