Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs RYKCX
FSLBX vs RYKCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs RYKCX
FSLBX vs RYKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. RYKCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and RYKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 941M vs. RYKCX (13.3M). RYKCX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: RYKCX (4.51) vs FSLBX (0.72). FSLBX was incepted earlier than RYKCX: FSLBX (41 years) vs RYKCX (25 years). RYKCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). RYKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 280.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYKCX: FSLBX (0) vs RYKCX (2500). RYKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.00 vs. FSLBX (-7.77). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 51.40 vs. RYKCX (43.24).
| FSLBX | RYKCX | FSLBX / RYKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.39 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.44 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.174 | 7.501 | -162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 941M | 13.3M | 7,075% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 4.51 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.77 | 30.00 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.96 | 103.01 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.40 | 43.24 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.63 | 152.54 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers