Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs RYKCX
FSLBX vs RYKCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs RYKCX
FSLBX vs RYKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. RYKCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Buy and RYKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 872M vs. RYKCX (12.5M). RYKCX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: RYKCX (4.19) vs FSLBX (0.76). FSLBX was incepted earlier than RYKCX: FSLBX (41 years) vs RYKCX (25 years). RYKCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYKCX: FSLBX (0) vs RYKCX (2500). RYKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.28 vs. FSLBX (-13.12). RYKCX (52.84) and FSLBX (52.27) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSLBX | RYKCX | FSLBX / RYKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.39 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.44 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.456 | 12.781 | -82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 872M | 12.5M | 6,976% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 4.19 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.12 | 25.28 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.62 | 99.81 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.27 | 52.84 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 212.59 | 148.00 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement