Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLBX vs RYKCX
FSLBX vs RYKCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLBX vs RYKCX
FSLBX vs RYKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLBX vs. RYKCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLBX is a Hold and RYKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 942M vs. RYKCX (12.7M). RYKCX pays higher dividends than FSLBX: RYKCX (4.07) vs FSLBX (0.69). FSLBX was incepted earlier than RYKCX: FSLBX (41 years) vs RYKCX (25 years). RYKCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYKCX: FSLBX (0) vs RYKCX (2500). RYKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.37 vs. FSLBX (-13.73). RYKCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.21 vs. FSLBX (51.36).
| FSLBX | RYKCX | FSLBX / RYKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.39 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.44 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.596 | 13.491 | -64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 942M | 12.7M | 7,417% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 4.07 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.73 | 28.37 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.05 | 86.23 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.36 | 55.21 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 220.74 | 154.27 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers