Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLCX vs FTHFX
FSLCX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts FSLCX vs FTHFX
FSLCX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLCX vs. FTHFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLCX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. FSLCX (1.34B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than FSLCX: FTHFX (0.56) vs FSLCX (0.14). FSLCX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: FSLCX (28 years) vs FTHFX (15 years). FSLCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). FSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: FSLCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. FSLCX (10.94). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. FSLCX (-2.76).
| FSLCX | FTHFX | FSLCX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.64 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.64 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.363 | 18.613 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 12.1B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.56 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.94 | 24.72 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.86 | 64.64 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.76 | 67.28 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.59 | 241.65 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement