Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLCX vs FTHFX
FSLCX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts FSLCX vs FTHFX
FSLCX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLCX vs. FTHFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLCX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. FSLCX (1.32B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than FSLCX: FTHFX (0.56) vs FSLCX (0.15). FSLCX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: FSLCX (29 years) vs FTHFX (15 years). FSLCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). FSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: FSLCX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. FSLCX (0.76). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. FSLCX (-9.29).
| FSLCX | FTHFX | FSLCX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.64 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.64 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.810 | 14.839 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 12.1B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.56 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.76 | 15.30 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.20 | 58.68 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.29 | 60.92 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.12 | 237.29 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement