Ad is loading...
FSLCX vs NAESX
FSLCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSLCX vs NAESX
Fidelity Small Cap Stock
Price$17.28
Change+$0.31 (+1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$103.13
Change+$2.17 (+2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
FSLCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLCX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLCX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. FSLCX (1.06B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSLCX: NAESX (1.39) vs FSLCX (0.05). FSLCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSLCX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSLCX (0.84) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). FSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSLCX (0) vs NAESX (3000). FSLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.95 vs. NAESX (-2.36). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 71.57 vs. FSLCX (29.04).
| FSLCX | NAESX | FSLCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.17 | 494% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.17 | 494% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.361 | -12.247 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 143B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 1.39 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.95 | -2.36 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.23 | 4.67 | -26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.04 | 71.57 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.57 | 78.60 | -22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...