Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLCX vs NAESX
FSLCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSLCX vs NAESX
FSLCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLCX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLCX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. FSLCX (1.32B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSLCX: NAESX (1.09) vs FSLCX (0.15). FSLCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSLCX (29 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FSLCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). FSLCX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. FSLCX (0.76). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. FSLCX (-9.29).
| FSLCX | NAESX | FSLCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.17 | 506% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.17 | 506% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.810 | 12.982 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 185B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.09 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.76 | 13.09 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.20 | 49.57 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.29 | 32.77 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.12 | 152.60 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers