Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLCX vs NAESX
FSLCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSLCX vs NAESX
FSLCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLCX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLCX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. FSLCX (1.43B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSLCX: NAESX (1.07) vs FSLCX (0.14). FSLCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSLCX (28 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FSLCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). FSLCX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.34 vs. FSLCX (12.89). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 38.39 vs. FSLCX (-1.89).
| FSLCX | NAESX | FSLCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.17 | 506% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.17 | 506% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.905 | 15.738 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 189B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 1.07 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.89 | 23.34 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.82 | 48.12 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.89 | 38.39 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.14 | 157.36 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers