Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLCX vs NAESX
FSLCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSLCX vs NAESX
FSLCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLCX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLCX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. FSLCX (1.33B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSLCX: NAESX (1.08) vs FSLCX (0.14). FSLCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSLCX (28 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FSLCX (0.87) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 124.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). FSLCX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.50 vs. FSLCX (22.30). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 34.56 vs. FSLCX (-1.55).
| FSLCX | NAESX | FSLCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.17 | 512% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.17 | 512% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.477 | 15.064 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 183B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 1.08 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.30 | 28.50 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.04 | 56.99 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.55 | 34.56 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.05 | 172.26 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers