Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLEX vs RYCNX
FSLEX vs RYCNX Comparison
Open Charts FSLEX vs RYCNX
FSLEX vs RYCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLEX vs. RYCNX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLEX is a Buy and RYCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLEX has more cash in the bank: 700M vs. RYCNX (6.56M). FSLEX pays higher dividends than RYCNX: FSLEX (0.36) vs RYCNX (0.06). FSLEX was incepted earlier than RYCNX: FSLEX (37 years) vs RYCNX (25 years). RYCNX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSLEX (0.68). RYCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSLEX (50.00). FSLEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCNX: FSLEX (0) vs RYCNX (2500). FSLEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.77 vs. RYCNX (21.93). FSLEX return over 5 years is better than : 66.79 vs. RYCNX (-24.41).
| FSLEX | RYCNX | FSLEX / RYCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.38 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.361 | 8.037 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 700M | 6.56M | 10,676% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.06 | 602% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.77 | 21.93 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.77 | 21.06 | 398% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.79 | -24.41 | -274% |
| Returns for 10 years | 191.09 | 41.97 | 455% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement