Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLSX vs JVMCX
FSLSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLSX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Value Strategies
Price$54.17
Change-$0.15 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.24
Change+$0.08 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.58B
FSLSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLSX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLSX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. FSLSX (1.7B). FSLSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FSLSX (0.77) vs JVMCX (0.00). FSLSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FSLSX (42 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FSLSX (0.80). FSLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). FSLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FSLSX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.03 vs. FSLSX (-8.32). FSLSX return over 5 years is better than : 77.59 vs. JVMCX (49.91).
| FSLSX | JVMCX | FSLSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.87 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.88 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.713 | 7.352 | -10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 22.6B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.32 | -3.03 | 274% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.86 | 20.46 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.59 | 49.91 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.47 | 33.62 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement