Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLSX vs JVMCX
FSLSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLSX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Value Strategies
Price$55.28
Change-$0.20 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.69B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.01
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.48B
FSLSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLSX vs. JVMCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLSX is a Hold and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.5B vs. FSLSX (1.69B). FSLSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FSLSX (0.72) vs JVMCX (0.00). FSLSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FSLSX (42 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FSLSX (0.80). FSLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). FSLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FSLSX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.96 vs. FSLSX (-11.39). FSLSX return over 5 years is better than : 47.72 vs. JVMCX (26.91).
| FSLSX | JVMCX | FSLSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.85 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.86 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.042 | 6.877 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.69B | 23.5B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.39 | -7.96 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.56 | 9.36 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.72 | 26.91 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.55 | 32.70 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement