Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLSX vs JVMCX
FSLSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLSX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Value Strategies
Price$51.57
Change+$0.63 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.03
Change+$0.25 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.45B
FSLSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLSX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLSX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. FSLSX (1.65B). FSLSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FSLSX (0.81) vs JVMCX (0.00). FSLSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FSLSX (41 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FSLSX (0.80). FSLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. JVMCX (47.00). FSLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FSLSX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.66 vs. FSLSX (-11.03). FSLSX return over 5 years is better than : 56.72 vs. JVMCX (33.39).
| FSLSX | JVMCX | FSLSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.87 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.88 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.891 | 1.897 | -363% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 21.5B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.03 | -4.66 | 237% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.19 | 1.47 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.72 | 33.39 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.22 | 25.96 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers