Ad is loading...
FSLSX vs JVMCX
FSLSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLSX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Value Strategies
Price$48.05
Change-$3.41 (-6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.84B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$23.82
Change-$1.40 (-5.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.35B
FSLSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLSX vs. JVMCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLSX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 21.4B vs. FSLSX (1.84B). FSLSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FSLSX (0.81) vs JVMCX (0.00). FSLSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FSLSX (41 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FSLSX (0.80). FSLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. JVMCX (47.00). FSLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FSLSX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.44 vs. FSLSX (-12.38). FSLSX return over 5 years is better than : 130.55 vs. JVMCX (81.86).
| FSLSX | JVMCX | FSLSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.87 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.88 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.940 | -0.316 | 1,879% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.84B | 21.4B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.38 | -9.44 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.40 | -3.54 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 130.55 | 81.86 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.08 | 22.51 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...