Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLSX vs JVMCX
FSLSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLSX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Value Strategies
Price$53.62
Change-$0.05 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.68B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.01
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.23B
FSLSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLSX vs. JVMCX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLSX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.2B vs. FSLSX (1.68B). FSLSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FSLSX (0.76) vs JVMCX (0.00). FSLSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FSLSX (42 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FSLSX (0.80). FSLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). FSLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FSLSX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.07 vs. FSLSX (-4.45). FSLSX return over 5 years is better than : 68.52 vs. JVMCX (43.66).
| FSLSX | JVMCX | FSLSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.87 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.88 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.901 | 6.561 | -29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.68B | 23.2B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.45 | 0.07 | -5,997% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.59 | 12.02 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.52 | 43.66 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.02 | 31.85 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement