Ad is loading...
FSLSX vs JVMCX
FSLSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLSX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Value Strategies
Price$55.93
Change+$0.28 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.14B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.25
Change+$0.14 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.02B
FSLSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLSX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jan 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLSX is a StrongBuy and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23B vs. FSLSX (2.14B). FSLSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FSLSX (0.57) vs JVMCX (0.01). FSLSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FSLSX (41 years) vs JVMCX (13 years). FSLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. JVMCX (41.00). FSLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FSLSX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). FSLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.38 vs. JVMCX (3.96). FSLSX return over 5 years is better than : 46.96 vs. JVMCX (20.76).
| FSLSX | JVMCX | FSLSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.230 | 3.755 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 23B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.01 | 4,037% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.38 | 3.96 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.45 | -1.63 | -640% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.96 | 20.76 | 226% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.00 | 35.61 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers