Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLSX vs JVMCX
FSLSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLSX vs JVMCX
FSLSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLSX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLSX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. FSLSX (2.2B). FSLSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FSLSX (0.70) vs JVMCX (0.00). FSLSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FSLSX (43 years) vs JVMCX (15 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FSLSX (0.66). FSLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. JVMCX (48.00). FSLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FSLSX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). FSLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.25 vs. JVMCX (6.33). FSLSX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. JVMCX (4.62).
| FSLSX | JVMCX | FSLSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.85 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.86 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.088 | 8.366 | 288% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 22.9B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.25 | 6.33 | 510% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.04 | 16.34 | 269% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | 4.62 | 806% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.37 | 48.50 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement