Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLVX vs RMEBX
FSLVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSLVX vs RMEBX
FSLVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. FSLVX (787M). FSLVX (1.04) and RMEBX (1.04) have matching dividends . FSLVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSLVX (25 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSLVX (0.81). FSLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FSLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FSLVX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FSLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.30 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. FSLVX (21.49).
| FSLVX | RMEBX | FSLVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.07 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.07 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.874 | 5.801 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 787M | 115B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.04 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.30 | 9.98 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.21 | 34.14 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.49 | 32.93 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.25 | 89.84 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement