Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLVX vs RMEBX
FSLVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSLVX vs RMEBX
FSLVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. FSLVX (787M). FSLVX (1.04) and RMEBX (1.04) have matching dividends . FSLVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSLVX (25 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSLVX (0.81). FSLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FSLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FSLVX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FSLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.56 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. FSLVX (26.14).
| FSLVX | RMEBX | FSLVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.07 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.07 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.931 | 6.308 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 787M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.04 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.56 | 9.11 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.17 | 34.37 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.14 | 34.74 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.69 | 94.33 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers