Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLVX vs RMFCX
FSLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLVX vs RMFCX
FSLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FSLVX (827M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSLVX: RMFCX (1.15) vs FSLVX (0.99). FSLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSLVX (25 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSLVX (0.81). FSLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). FSLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FSLVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). FSLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.05 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. FSLVX (32.84).
| FSLVX | RMFCX | FSLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.719 | 10.454 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 827M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.15 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.05 | 9.14 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.65 | 38.82 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.84 | 36.70 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.74 | 92.27 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement