Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLVX vs RMFCX
FSLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLVX vs RMFCX
FSLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. FSLVX (787M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSLVX: RMFCX (1.19) vs FSLVX (1.04). FSLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSLVX (25 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSLVX (0.81). FSLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). FSLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FSLVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). FSLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.30 vs. RMFCX (10.10). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. FSLVX (21.49).
| FSLVX | RMFCX | FSLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.874 | 5.845 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 787M | 115B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.19 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.30 | 10.10 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.21 | 34.65 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.49 | 33.85 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.25 | 91.46 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers