Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLVX vs RMFCX
FSLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSLVX vs RMFCX
FSLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FSLVX (792M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSLVX: RMFCX (1.16) vs FSLVX (1.03). FSLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSLVX (25 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSLVX (0.81). FSLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). FSLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FSLVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). FSLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.04 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. FSLVX (28.63).
| FSLVX | RMFCX | FSLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.022 | 9.137 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 792M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.16 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.04 | 8.88 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.69 | 34.84 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.63 | 37.23 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.70 | 91.06 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement